The above are all the products of our company, as well as detailed classifications and information. If you need them, Please find below contact details
and contact us today! Our experts always ready to help you.
How to Choose Space Solar Cells That Meet Your Satellite’s Specific Power Demands
In satellite design, the precise matching of solar cell selection and power requirements is the core link to ensure the success of the mission. This process requires comprehensive consideration of multiple factors such as efficiency, durability, weight, and size, while taking into account the characteristics of the task and spatial environmental conditions. This article will systematically explain how to achieve the optimal matching between space solar cells and satellite power requirements.
1、Satellite power demand analysis: clarifying energy benchmark
1. Load power accounting
The total power demand of the satellite is jointly determined by all electrical systems, including computers, sensors, communication equipment, etc. The power range of different types of tasks varies significantly, and comprehensive load power statistics need to be completed first:
| acecraft / Mission Type | Typical Power Requirement (W) | Notes |
| neral interplanetary spacecraft | 300 - 2500 | Power to supply computers, transmitters, instruments, sensors, etc. |
| ssini | ~1000 | Used radioisotope power but power figure is indicative |
| rth-orbiters(e.g., Hubble) | Hundreds to low thousands | Use solar power extensively |
| rs orbiters (e.g., Mars Global Surveyor, Mars Pathfinder) | Hundreds to low thousands | Designed to use solar power |
Core steps: Add up the power requirements of each satellite system item by item to obtain the total power benchmark, which is the basis for subsequent solar cell selection and array size design.
2.Task deadline and power attenuation considerations
The duration of satellite missions directly affects power planning: short-term missions (months) and long-term missions (years) have vastly different durability requirements for solar cells. The radiation and temperature fluctuations in the space environment can cause the efficiency of solar cells to decay over time, and it is necessary to plan the margin in advance. For example:
In low Earth orbit (LEO) missions, the radiation environment is relatively mild, but an annual efficiency decay of 1% -10% still needs to be considered;
Deep space missions, such as Mars exploration, face stronger radiation and may experience higher attenuation rates.
The power attenuation trend can be predicted through the formula:
P ₜ=P ₀ × (1- attenuation coefficient) ^ t
Among them, P ₜis the power after time t, P ₀is the initial power, and the attenuation coefficient needs to be determined according to the battery type and spatial environment.
3. The impact of space environment on power output
Extreme conditions in the space environment can significantly affect the performance of solar cells, and targeted response strategies need to be designed:
| Environmental factors | The degree of impact on performance | Response suggestions | ||
| radiation | Long term efficiency degradation of 30% -50% | Choose high radiation resistant batteries (such as multi junction gallium arsenide) | ||
| Temperature fluctuations | -Material aging caused by cycling from 150 ℃ to+120 ℃ | Optimize thermal control design and use temperature resistant materials | ||
|
Reduce output by 0.08% for every 1 ° deviation | Design high-precision solar tracking system | ||
| Micro meteorite impact | Partial damage leads to power loss | Integrated bypass diode to reduce the impact of single point faults |
Comprehensive environmental factors may result in a performance loss of up to 60% -70% for solar cells, therefore sufficient redundancy needs to be reserved in power planning.
2、 Spacecraft constraints: physical and engineering limitations
1. Volume and interface design
The internal space of the satellite is limited, and the solar panels need to be efficiently integrated with the satellite structure. Attention should be paid to the following during design:
Folding/unfolding mechanism: CubeSat and other small satellites often use foldable solar panels, ensuring reliable unfolding;
Interface compatibility: The electrical interface between the battery board and the satellite power supply system needs to be matched to avoid connection failures during launch or in orbit operation;
Layout planning: Verify the spatial adaptability of each component through 3D modeling to ensure heat dissipation and electromagnetic compatibility.
2.Weight and Launch Cost Control
The launch cost is directly linked to the weight of the satellite and needs to be balanced between power demand and weight:
Lightweight materials are preferred, such as aluminum alloy (accounting for about 40% of the satellite's weight), flexible film materials, etc;
Optimization of power to weight ratio: Priority should be given to high specific power batteries (such as multi junction batteries with a power to weight ratio of over 300W/kg);
Material environmental friendliness: Avoid using rare or polluting materials such as lithium and cadmium telluride to reduce supply chain risks.
3.Dynamic behavior stability
The attitude changes and solar panel vibrations during satellite orbit can affect the stability of power output
Simulate the dynamic coupling between solar panels and satellite bodies through finite element modeling;
Using mathematical models to predict the impact of orbital changes on power output;
Test the response speed of the power system to sudden attitude adjustments to ensure power supply continuity.
3、Comparison of Types and Characteristics of Space Solar Cells
Different types of solar cells have their own advantages in efficiency, durability, weight, etc., and should be selected according to task requirements:
| Type | Efficiency Range (BOL) | Lifespan (years) | Core advantages | Typical application scenarios |
| Multi junction gallium arsenide battery | 29.5%-32.2% | 15-20 | High efficiency, radiation resistance, high power to weight ratio | Small spacecraft, LEO missions (such as SpectroLab XTJ series) |
| Deteriorated multi junction battery | 32.0% | 10+ | Lightweight and flexible, mature in orbit verification (since LEO flight in 2018) | Lightweight satellites, short-term to medium-term missions |
| Monocrystalline silicon battery | 18%-26.8% | 30-40 | Long term high reliability, with an annual decay rate of only 0.18% -0.29% | Long term deep space missions and high stability requirements |
| Flexible CIGS thin-film battery | 22.7%-24.6% | 10-15 | Flexible, lightweight, and low-cost | Small satellites and curved installation scenarios |
Note: BOL (Beginning of Life) efficiency refers to the initial efficiency of the battery, which will decay over time during in orbit operation. Multi junction batteries have an efficiency of about 30% in practical tasks, while thin-film batteries are more suitable for weight sensitive tasks.
4、 Core indicators and steps for selecting solar cells
1. Core selection indicators
Efficiency and power output: High efficiency batteries can reduce panel area and weight. Calculation formula:
Required area=End of mission power/(solar irradiance x efficiency x degradation coefficient)
The solar irradiance in Earth's orbit is about 1361W/m ², and deep space missions need to be adjusted according to distance
Degradation rate: Low attenuation batteries are preferred, and the end-of-life power is predicted using the formula P ₜ=P ₀ × (1- C × ln (1+φ/φ ₀)) (where C and φ ₀ are the battery and environmental constants);
Power to weight ratio: The output power per unit weight of a multi junction battery is usually better than that of a silicon battery (such as a 2D MoS ₂ array that can reach 6697.74W/kg, far exceeding the 26.02W/kg of a silicon battery);
Folding efficiency: The power/volume ratio between the folded and unfolded states, in which flexible thin-film batteries perform better.
2. Selection steps
Determine the power demand at the end of the task: comprehensively predict the load power and attenuation, and clarify the minimum power threshold;
Filter battery types: preliminarily narrow down the range based on task duration (short-term/long-term) and orbital environment (LEO/deep space);
Performance verification: Verify the efficiency and attenuation characteristics of the battery in the target environment through simulation or experimental data;
Engineering compatibility check: Verify the compatibility of volume, weight, interface, and satellite design;
Redundancy design: Based on environmental impact assessment, reserve 10% -30% power redundancy.
5、Integration and deployment of solar panels
1. Electrical and mechanical integration
Electrical compatibility: Ensure that the output voltage and current of the battery board match the satellite power supply system, and integrate maximum power point tracking (MPPT) circuit to optimize efficiency;
Mechanical stability: High strength materials such as 7075 aluminum alloy and TC4 titanium alloy are used to fix the solar panel, and bolt connections or constraint structures are used to resist launch impacts;
Thermal management: Use thermal coatings, heat pipes, etc. to control the operating temperature of the battery between -40 ℃ and+85 ℃, avoiding performance degradation caused by extreme temperatures.
2. Reliability of deployment mechanism
Folding solar panels need to ensure successful deployment in orbit:
Using computer vision and machine learning techniques to monitor the unfolding status (with a model accuracy of approximately 70%);
Verify the reliability of the deployment mechanism in vacuum and low-temperature environments through ground testing;
Integrated fault redundancy design, such as backup drive devices, reduces the risk of deployment failure.
6、 Space grade solar cell procurement and certification
1. Key points for supplier selection
Technical parameters: core indicators such as efficiency, radiation resistance, power to weight ratio, etc;
Heritage: Priority should be given to products with successful in orbit application records, such as the SpectroLab XTJ series and SolAero deteriorated multi junction batteries;
Support capability: Can you provide test samples, technical documentation, and after-sales support;
Delivery cycle: Order 6-12 months in advance, with reserved time for testing and problem-solving.
2. Certification and Quality Assurance
Certification standards: Space level certification is required through radiation testing (such as total dose irradiation, proton/electron bombardment), thermal cycling testing (-150 ℃ to+120 ℃), etc;
Quality traceability: Require suppliers to provide complete production and testing records to ensure batch consistency;
In orbit verification: Prioritize battery models that have been validated in similar missions to reduce technical risks.
7、 Case study: Solar cell selection for CubeSat mission
Task requirement: Low Earth Orbit (LEO) 2-year mission with a final power requirement of 2.5W and a weight limit of<1kg.
Selection process:
Power redundancy calculation: Considering an average annual attenuation of 5%, the initial power needs to be ≥ 3.0W;
Battery type screening: Excluding low efficiency polycrystalline silicon, focusing on multi junction gallium arsenide (efficiency 30%) or flexible CIGS (efficiency 22.7%);
Performance comparison: Multi junction batteries require a smaller area (about 0.0078m ²) and are lighter in weight (about 0.2kg), which is superior to CIGS;
Engineering adaptation: Choose foldable multi junction solar panels with a folding volume of less than 100cm ³ to meet the space limitations of CubeSat;
Final choice: SpectroLab XTJ series multi junction battery, with 20% power redundancy reserved (actual final power ≥ 3.0W).
conclusion
The matching of space solar cells with satellite power requirements needs to run through the entire process of mission design, from power demand accounting, environmental impact assessment, to battery selection and integration verification. Each step needs to consider performance, reliability, and engineering feasibility. Through scientific selection methods and redundant design, the satellite can ensure stable energy supply throughout the entire mission cycle, laying the foundation for the success of the mission.
Previous：The relationship between AI and space solar cells
Next：Return to the list
